Gelesen in: http://environment.guardian.co.uk/climatechange/story/0,,2032821,00.html:
Self-evidently dangerous climate change will not emerge from a normal scientific process of truth seeking, although science will gain some insights into the question if it recognises the socially contingent dimensions of a post-normal science. But to proffer such insights, scientists - and politicians - must trade (normal) truth for influence. If scientists want to remain listened to, to bear influence on policy, they must recognise the social limits of their truth seeking and reveal fully the values and beliefs they bring to their scientific activity.
Climate change is too important to be left to scientists - least of all the normal ones.
Soziales Engineering aufgrund von Glaubensbekenntnisse?
Kommentar dazu: http://www.melaniephillips.com/diary/?p=1469
CDC Tells Public that Saving Millions of Lives is Offset by Youth Ripping
Some Tobacco-Free, Smokeless Vapes
-
The CDC's Office on Smoking and Health (where I worked for two years as an
EIS Officer in the Commissioned Corps of the U.S. Public Health Service)
has j...
vor 1 Tag
