Gelesen in: http://environment.guardian.co.uk/climatechange/story/0,,2032821,00.html:
Self-evidently dangerous climate change will not emerge from a normal scientific process of truth seeking, although science will gain some insights into the question if it recognises the socially contingent dimensions of a post-normal science. But to proffer such insights, scientists - and politicians - must trade (normal) truth for influence. If scientists want to remain listened to, to bear influence on policy, they must recognise the social limits of their truth seeking and reveal fully the values and beliefs they bring to their scientific activity.
Climate change is too important to be left to scientists - least of all the normal ones.
Soziales Engineering aufgrund von Glaubensbekenntnisse?
Kommentar dazu: http://www.melaniephillips.com/diary/?p=1469
Many Tobacco Control Organizations are Asserting that Quitting Smoking is
Not Quitting Smoking if You Use E-Cigarettes to Quit
-
The American Lung Association has long been trumpeting the falsehood that
quitting smoking by switching to electronic cigarettes isn't quitting
smoking, ...
vor 2 Wochen
